In a civil proceeding, if scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise. In brown, the court declared that the distinction between lay and expert witness testimony is that lay. If the witness is not testifying as an expert, the witnesss testimony in the form of. This circuit split has recently been deepened by several circuit court cases allowing the admission of evidence based on the opinions of nonexpert, nonpercipient witnesses. Generally, lay opinion evidence refers to evidence given by a witness who is not an expert witness, but. Introduction we all speak in generalities, opinions, conclusions and characterizations. Consequently, if a fact or evidence at issue involves scientific, technical or specialized knowledge that is outside the. Lack of authentication 901a this is a question of foundation when trying to introduce a document into evidence.
There is no duty to crossexamine a lay witness as an expert. Second, a lay witness with firsthand knowledge may give an opinion only if it is helpful to a clear understanding of the witness s testimony or to the determination of a fact in issue. The origin of the courts aversion to evidence of opinion is in the common laws concern to receive the most reliable evidence. The article then focuses on the dividing line between lay and opinion testimony. The opinion rule indiana university maurer school of law. Opinions and expert testimony article vii texas rules of. If a witness is not testifying as an expert, testimony in the form of an opinion is limited to one that is. Dec 15, 2018 rule 11701 opinion testimony by lay witnesses if a witness is not testifying as an expert, testimony in the form of an opinion is limited to one that is a. Witness opinion testimony rationally based upon a foundation of personal knowledge possessed by the average person, which includes socalled particularized knowledge collective fact and skilled lay observer witness opinion testimony, is simply lay witness opinion testimony subject to lay witness disclosure. There are a myriad of distinctions in evidence law. Opinion testimony of lay witness free legal information laws, blogs, legal services and more. Lay witness testimony cannot be used to present evidence on matters beyond the ordinary laymans knowledge or experience.
Lay opinion is limited to testimony that is based on the witness firsthand knowledge and that is also a rationally based on the witness ptions and perce2 helpful to a clear understanding of the testimony or the determination of a fact in issue. Evidence to prove personal knowledge may, but need not, consist of the testimony of the witness himself. Opinion evidence from a lay witness is admissible if it is based on what the witness saw, heard or otherwise perceived about a matter or event, and evidence of the opinion is necessary to obtain an adequate account or understanding of the witness perception of the matter or event evidence act 2008 s78. Thus, the accused has little choice but to call an expert, who is likely expensive, and may not pass the more stringent test for expert opinion. A lay witness is distinguished from an expert testimony, who testifies based upon their qualifications of expertise in their field. There must be a rational basis for the lay opinion otherwise it may be. The general principle that witnesses must testify to facts and not inferences or opinions is so. Under the federal rules of evidence fre, a court will permit a person who isnt testifying as an expert to testify in the form of an opinion if its both rationally based on their perception and helps to explain the witnesss testimony. Canadian criminal evidenceopinionlay opinion evidence. A witness may not testify to a matter unless evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that he has personal knowledge of the matter. Policy for lay evidence of capability lay evidence nonmedical and nonlegal evidence of capability helps you understand how the beneficiary has been managing any benefits and other funds that have been available to them to meet daily needs food, shelter, clothing, and medical care. Lay opinion testimony is governed by rule 701,2 which reads. In other words, it would be reasonable for the witness, on the basis of the perceived facts, to form the opinion or inference.
If the witness is not testifying as an expert, the witness s testi mony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to those. How these rules affect examiners of friction ridge impressions will be discussed. If a witness is not testifying as an expert, testimony in the form of an opinion or inference is limited to one that is. Opinion evidence legal definition of opinion evidence. The first requirement for admissibility of a lay witnesss opinion or inference, as set forth in paragraph a, is for the testimony to be rationally based on the witnesss personal perception. A lay witness giving opinion evidence does not displace the need of a party to obtain expert evidence. Broadly speaking, a witness in a court proceeding is only supposed to testify as to what he or she observed, and is not to give an opinion on what specifically was observed. Article vii of the texas rules of evidence reflects a trend by the texas courts to place more confidence in both the ability of juries and in the abilities of the attorney to test the weight and. Lay opinion testimony and expert opinion testimony differentiated.
Fre 701, opinion testimony by lay witnesses, permits a better understanding of the distinction between opinion testimony offered by an expert and those instances where even a lay witness may offer opinions in a court of law. The admissibility of a witnesss opinion evidence in courts of law. The federal rules of evidence provide for two categories of opinion testimony. Benton harbor engineering71 was the motivating force for the amendment to federal rule of evidence 701 that took effect on december 1, 2000. Rule 701 provides, in part, that a lay witness may testify in the form of an opinion or inference, if the opinion or inference is rationally based on the perception of the witness and helpful to a clear understanding of the witness testimony or the determination of a fact in issue. Justice david m watt, watts manual of criminal evidence. That is the kind of distinction made by the amendment to this rule. Lay opinion testimony and expert opinion testimony. This is a california jury instructions form that can be used for 02 evidence. Courts of appeals are divided over whether lay opinions not based on. Federal rule of evidence 701 allows the admission of lay witness opinions not based on firsthand perception. Lay opinion, being an opinion of a person who is not qualified as an expert, can be admissible in trial where the opinion constitutes a compendious statement of the observations of a witness in relation to matters of common experience where no special knowledge is required and the opinion is so close to fact. This article discusses opinion testimony of lay witnesses and expert witnesses. Rules 701 and 702 still require that opinions be helpful to the trier of fact, and it could still be excluded under rule 403.
This rule is subject to the provisions of rule 703, relating to opinion. Under rule 702, an expert may testify to an opinion or otherwise. Your use of this heinonline pdf indicates your acceptance. Evidence of what the witness thinks, believes, or infers in regard to facts in dispute, as distinguished from personal knowledge of the facts themselves. The fact that a lay witness was not asked for an opinion on whether. Many jurisdictions, as well as the federal rules of evidence, now allow for lay witness opinion testimony in certain circumstances. The rules of evidence ordinarily do not permit witnesses to testify as to opinions or conclusions. Opinion testimony by lay witnesses federal rules of evidence. Rule 701 opinion testimony by lay witnesses if the witness is not testifying as an expert, the witness testimony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to those opinions or inferences which are. Improper lay opinion 701 the witness is giving testimony that does not require an expertise, but is still an opinion that does not assist the jury in its understanding of the case. Opinions and expert testimony article vii texas rules.
May 09, 2017 this article examines the prosecution calling of law enforcement officials under the guise of lay witness testimony to render opinion testimony, a practice supported by the department of justice, thus avoiding expert witness disclosure and reliability requirements, in spite of the amendment to fed. If the witness is not testifying as an expert, the witnesss testi mony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to those. Witness on direct exam is not hearsay is evidence of a statement oral orwritten. Justia california civil jury instructions caci 2017 223. Practice note opinion evidence, experts and assessors hcpts.
Evidence presented orally by witnesses during trials or before grand juries. Witness hearsay 801, 802 counsels question calls for hearsay or witness answer is based on hearsay. Rule 11701 opinion testimony by lay witnesses if a witness is not testifying as an expert, testimony in the form of an opinion is limited to one that is a. Iii lay opinion testimony a retained expert witness is different than a lay witness, including a lay witness permitted to provide opinion testimony, because an expert, qualified by knowledge, skill, education or training testifying from sufficient facts applying reliable principles and methods can rely on. Lay witness article about lay witness by the free dictionary. An opinion may include reasonable inferences that the. The relationship between lay and expert witness opinion testimony is multifaceted.
Justia california criminal jury instructions calcrim 2017 333. Or is she a lay witness with an unusual experience base. Must also ask that the jury be instructed to disregard the statement. Drawing the line between lay and expert opinion evidence. The risk of proffering financial expert testimony in lay. Witness do also testifying that bob was drunk, it was a hot evening, he was driving too fast, and the road was dark. Strengthening the lay opinion rule anne bowen poulin i. Nonetheless, the rules of evidenceboth state and federalallow counsel to present opinion testimony, both lay and expert. The fact that a lay witness has a personal involvement goes, very much, to the weight to be given to any opinion. Lay opinion, being an opinion of a person who is not qualified as an expert, can be admissible in trial where the opinion constitutes a compendious statement of the observations of a witness in relation to matters of common experience where no special knowledge is required and the opinion is so close to fact that it is impossible to separate the two. Of particular importance in this context is the approach which should be adopted for scientific, or purportedly scientific, evidence tendered for admission in crown court jury trials. Witness on direct exam is not hearsay is evidence of a. Opinion evidence from a lay witness is admissible if it is based on what the witness saw, heard or otherwise perceived about a matter or event, and evidence of the opinion is necessary to obtain an adequate account or understanding of the witness perception of.
However, there are two exceptions to this general rule. Security of person and property searches seizures warrants. The requirement that the lay opinion be based on a witness perception is the embodiment. It would be folly to try to prevent such testimony, and the opinion rule reflects this reality. Imwinkelried j ustice holmes once remarked that the law is constantly drawing lines. However, in a criminal case, an expert witness must not state an opinion about whether the defendant had a mental state that constitutes an element of the crime or a defense. The topic of opinion testimony arises with great frequency in litigation, whether the opinion is from a lay witness concerning the value of her property or from an expert witness on dna. Rule 701 opinion testimony by lay witnesses if a witness is not testifying as an expert, testimony in the form of an opinion is limited to one that is. An expert is permitted to base his opinion on hearsay evidence and need not have personal knowledge of the facts underlying his opinion.
Expert evidence, and nonexpert evidence given by a layperson. The court in brown noted that a lay witness with experience could testify that a substance appeared to be blood, but that a witness would have to qualify as an expert before he could testify that bruising around the eyes is indicative of skull trauma. Federal rule of evidence fre 701 admits opinion testimony by lay witnesses. This heightened gatekeeping of expert opinion has motivated parties to sidestep those rules and admit evidence as lay opinion, which is subject to a more flexible and discretionary test. Rule 701 opinion testimony by lay witnesses 20 kentucky. Mar 22, 20 nonetheless, the rules of evidenceboth state and federalallow counsel to present opinion testimony, both lay and expert. Rule 701, opinion testimony by lay witnesses, provides.
1237 1129 344 191 1188 1472 392 45 560 1479 314 374 1034 1364 64 1318 741 539 1322 1025 429 1439 1333 160 752 348 568 213 647 376 1126 431 1288 1101 1215 717 1335 1468 834 709 935 704